Whether High Court under Section 29A of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 would have jurisdiction to entertain for extension of time application, when the arbitral tribunal was appointed by the Supreme Court exercising power under Section 11(5) of the Act, being an international commercial arbitration – Cabra Instalaciones Y Servicios , S. A. Vs. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. – Bombay High Court

Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me     Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here to […]

Whether High Court under Section 29A of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 would have jurisdiction to entertain for extension of time application, when the arbitral tribunal was appointed by the Supreme Court exercising power under Section 11(5) of the Act, being an international commercial arbitration – Cabra Instalaciones Y Servicios , S. A. Vs. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. – Bombay High Court Read Post »