After extended period of 90 days of the Insolvency Commencement Date, the IRP/RP is not obliged to accept the claim – Deputy Commissioner, UTGST, Daman Vs. Rajeev Dhingra IRP for Radha Madhav Corporation Ltd. – NCLAT New Delhi

Hon’ble NCLAT held that:
(i) From a plain reading of the CIRP Regulation 12, RP can accept the claim as per extended period as provided in CIRP Regulation 12(2). After extended period of 90 days of the insolvency commencement date, the IRP/RP is not obliged to accept the claim. Prima-facie, the said CIRP regulation has not provided any discretion to RP for admitting their claim after the extended period.
(ii) When a resolution plan has already been received and approved by the CoC, we are inclined to agree that if the claims of creditors are accepted at a belated stage after the stipulated time provided for submitting claims, then the possibility of resolution plan failing to materialize becomes very high and tantamount to defeat the objectives of IBC making the CIRP a time bound process.
(iii) The Adjudicating Authority cannot substitute its views with the commercial wisdom of the CoC nor deal with the merits of Resolution Plan unless it is found it to be contrary to the express provisions of law and against the public interest.
(iv) In the given statutory framework of IBC, there is only limited review which can be exercised by the Adjudicating Authority without trespassing upon the business decision of the CoC.
(v) The approved resolution can only be challenged before the Appellate Authority on limited grounds in terms of Section 61(3) of the IBC.

After extended period of 90 days of the Insolvency Commencement Date, the IRP/RP is not obliged to accept the claim – Deputy Commissioner, UTGST, Daman Vs. Rajeev Dhingra IRP for Radha Madhav Corporation Ltd. – NCLAT New Delhi Read Post »