MCA Notification dated 24.03.2020 is prospective in nature & will not apply to the pending applications filed before the NCLT (waiting for admission), prior to the issuance of the notification – Madhusudan Tantia Vs. Amit Choraria – NCLAT New Delhi

NCLAT held that the notification dated 24.03.2020 of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India, is prospective in nature and it is not retrospective or retroactive in nature. Further, the said notification will not apply to the pending applications filed before the concerned ‘Adjudicating Authority’ (Authorities), under IBC (waiting for admission), prior to the issuance of the aforesaid notification, as opined by this Tribunal. Viewed in the above prospectives, the conclusion arrived at by the ‘Adjudicating Authority’ in the impugned order to the effect that the notification dated 24.03.2020 of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India, shall be considered as prospective and not retrospective and the finding that there was no payment on the side of ‘Corporate Debtor’ after receipt of Demand Notice, no pre-existing dispute also alleged or proved and ultimately admitting the application filed by the 2nd Respondent / Operational Creditor are free from legal infirmities. Resultantly, the instant Appeal fails.

MCA Notification dated 24.03.2020 is prospective in nature & will not apply to the pending applications filed before the NCLT (waiting for admission), prior to the issuance of the notification – Madhusudan Tantia Vs. Amit Choraria – NCLAT New Delhi Read Post »