CA(AT)(I)-729/2020-NCLAT

NCLAT is not vested with any power to review the judgment, however, in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction NCLAT can entertain an application for recall of judgment on sufficient grounds – Union Bank of India (Erstwhile Corporation Bank) Vs. Dinkar T. Venkatasubramanian & Ors. – NCLAT New Delhi

NCLAT held that the three-member bench judgment in Agarwal Coal Corporation Pvt. Ltd. and K.L.J Resources Ltd. & Anr. observing that the Tribunal does not have power to recall cannot be approved. The three-member bench judgments of this Tribunal insofar as observation that this Tribunal has no power to review, no exception can be taken to that part of the judgment. We, however, hold that the judgment laying down that this Tribunal has no power to recall the judgment does not lay down correct law. It is also held that this Tribunal is not vested with any power to review the judgment, however, in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction this Tribunal can entertain an application for recall of judgment on sufficient grounds.

NCLAT is not vested with any power to review the judgment, however, in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction NCLAT can entertain an application for recall of judgment on sufficient grounds – Union Bank of India (Erstwhile Corporation Bank) Vs. Dinkar T. Venkatasubramanian & Ors. – NCLAT New Delhi Read Post »

The phrase used in Section 17(1)(d) of the IBC that financial institution “shall act on the instructions of the IRP” does not mean that it authorises IRP/RP to compel the financial institution for maintaining the accounts of the Corporate Debtor to continue the Non-Fund Based Facility comforted by Bank Guarantee – Union Bank of India Vs. Mr Dinkar T. Venkatasubramanian RP of Amtek Auto Ltd.- NCLAT New Delhi

Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me     Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here to

The phrase used in Section 17(1)(d) of the IBC that financial institution “shall act on the instructions of the IRP” does not mean that it authorises IRP/RP to compel the financial institution for maintaining the accounts of the Corporate Debtor to continue the Non-Fund Based Facility comforted by Bank Guarantee – Union Bank of India Vs. Mr Dinkar T. Venkatasubramanian RP of Amtek Auto Ltd.- NCLAT New Delhi Read Post »

Scroll to Top