Even after the lapse of 981 days and repeated compliance by the RP of the direction of the AA; the AA has not yet considered initiation of Liquidation as per Section 33 of the Code – Kuldeep Verma, Resolution Professional K. S. Oils Ltd. Vs. State Bank of India- NCLAT New Delhi

It is held that if this Appellate Tribunal consider the intervention Application i.e. IA No. 357 of 2021, it will again move in a wrong direction and will violate the principles of natural justice as the Code and the Regulator IBBI has prescribed a process for selection of Resolution Applicant which initially starts with Invitation for Expression of Interest (EOI) followed by Information Memorandum, Evaluation Matrix and a request for Resolution Plan in accordance with Chapter –X of IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016. Hence, such midway interruptions of allowing a party to enter the fray after 3 years of issue of EOI is neither warranted by the Regulations nor by the Code.

Even after the lapse of 981 days and repeated compliance by the RP of the direction of the AA; the AA has not yet considered initiation of Liquidation as per Section 33 of the Code – Kuldeep Verma, Resolution Professional K. S. Oils Ltd. Vs. State Bank of India- NCLAT New Delhi Read Post »