Section 44 of RERA, 2016 itself permits the Appellate Tribunal to condone the delay on its satisfaction regarding sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal within limitation – Arpit Khosla and Anr. Vs. Gardenia Aims Developers Pvt. Ltd. – Allahabad High Court

Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me     Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here […]

Related Posts:

Whether the provisions of the RERA would apply in case of an ‘Agreement to Lease’? | Whether the definition of the term “Promoter”, as provided under Section 2(zk) in the RERA, would include a ‘Lessor’? | Whether the remedy provided to the ‘Allottees’ under Section 18 of the RERA can be available only against the ‘Promoter’, or, in that sense, also against a ‘Lessor’? – Lavasa Corporation Ltd. Vs. Jitendra Jagdish Tulsiani – Bombay High Court

Case Laws-RERA-High Courts
Scroll to Top