Is ‘Regularization Penalty’ imposed by Local Authority/ Municipal Corporation covered under Section 31(1) of IBC and stand extinguished on approval of the Resolution Plan? – Kamla Industrial Park Ltd. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai – Bombay High Court

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.

 

Can a party challenge Arbitrator appointment u/s 11 and Order of Arbitrator u/s 16 under Writ Jurisdiction (Articles 226 and 227) on the ground that during CIRP, the Corporate Debtor participated through JV, in the Tender and was awarded job without disclosing about the CIRP of the Corporate Debtor – Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs. Om Construction – Bombay High Court

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.

 

Inspection Order has not been signed by the Executive Director of IBBI but the Assistant General Manager, High Court stays implementation and execution of IBBI Disciplinary Committee Order- Partha Sarathy Sarkar Vs. Insolvency & Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) & Ors.- Bombay High Court

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.

 

NCLT order which has attained finality on dismissing appeal by NCLAT on limitation period ground cannot be interfered by High Court in Writ Petition under Article 226 – Naresh Sundarlal Jain Vs. Udaipur Entertainment World Pvt. Ltd. – Bombay High Court

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.

 

The matter of confiscation of properties and issue notice to Official Liquidator to appear & represent Company under winding up would arise for consideration only once the declaration as sought by Enforcement Directorate u/s 4 of the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018 is allowed – Mehul Choksi Vs. State of Maharashtra – Bombay High Court

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.

 

The disputes pertaining to oppression and mismanagement under Indian law, are not arbitrable and only the NCLT has exclusive jurisdiction to decide such disputes – Anupam Mittal Vs. People Interactive (India) Pvt. Ltd. and others – Bombay High Court

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.

 

Chairperson of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) is a separate and distinct category from a Whole-Time Member and a Disciplinary Order passed by the Chairperson against Insolvency Professional is without jurisdiction – Poonam Basak Vs. Union of India & Ors. – Bombay High Court

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.

 

The position of an agent of Receiver cannot be termed as possession or occupation contemplated by Section 14(1)(d) of the IBC – Urshila Ajit Kerkar Vs. Office of the Court Receiver, High Court, Bombay & Anr. – Bombay High Court

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.