Date of Default cannot be shifted if a notice for payment is again issued because that would enable the Creditor to shift the Date of Default in every case by simply issuing a legal notice subsequent to the exclusion period having ended and the provisions of Section 10A of the IBC would become redundant and meaningless – Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. Vs. Manyata Developers Pvt. Ltd. – NCLT Bengaluru Bench

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.

 

The issue of fixing of EMD and its reasonableness in EOI is a matter which comes within the scope of Commercial Wisdom of the CoC and Adjudicating Authority has no jurisdiction to sit in appeal – Atharv Intertrade Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Mr. Shivadutt Bannanje, RP for Dnyanyogi Shri Shivakumar Swamji Sugars Ltd. – NCLT Bengaluru Bench

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.

 

Interest cannot be clubbed with the Principal amount for the purpose of threshold requirement under Section 9 of IBC unless there is an express provision for such addition in the Agreement, Work order or the Invoices – J Rajendra Naidu Vs. Amma Construction India Pvt. Ltd. – NCLT Bengaluru Bench

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.

 

Mere filing of a suit for recovery or the Decree passed by a Court cannot shift forward the Date of Default and accordingly the Date of Default cannot be shifted to the Date of Decree – Metenere Global Ltd. Vs. MLC Estates LLP – NCLT Bengaluru Bench

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.