07Jul Simplex Housing Projects Ltd. Vs. State Bank of India – Rajasthan High Court Posted by Ramroopon July 7, 2023July 17, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-High Courts Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
13Feb With the finalization of insolvency resolution plan and the approval thereof by the NCLT, all dues of creditors, Corporate, Statutory and others stand extinguished and no demand can be raised for the period prior to the specified date – M/s EMC Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan – Rajasthan High Court Posted by IBC Laws Editoron February 13, 2023July 20, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-High Courts, Newsletter-IBC Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
31Jan State of Rajasthan Vs. UltraTech Cement Ltd. – Rajasthan High Court Posted by IBC Laws Editoron January 31, 2023February 19, 2023in Companies Act-High Courts Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
12Jan A bare perusal of Sections 17, 18, 19(19), 31 and 34 of Recovery of Debts & Bankruptcy Act, 1993 shows that the DRT is having exclusive jurisdiction to deal with the recovery of the secured creditors and is having an overriding effect over all other laws – The Specified Undertaking of The Unit Trust of India Vs. M/s Derby Textiles Ltd. – Rajasthan High Court Posted by IBC Laws Editoron January 12, 2023July 16, 2023in Case Laws-SARFAESI-High Courts, Companies Act-High Courts, Newsletter-IBC Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
04Aug A group of financial creditors can converge and join hands to touch the financial limit of Rs. 1 crore stipulated under Section 7 of IBC so as to initiate a CIRP under the IBC – Vishnu Oil Mill Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India – High Court of Rajasthan High Court Posted by IBC Laws Editoron August 4, 2022July 13, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-High Courts, Newsletter-IBC Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
03Aug The Specified Undertaking of The UTI Vs. M/s Derby Textiles Ltd. – Rajasthan High Court Posted by IBC Laws Editoron August 3, 2022August 15, 2022in Case Laws-SARFAESI-High Courts, Companies Act-High Courts, Newsletter-IBC Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
18Apr M/s Ultratech Nathdwara Cement Ltd. Vs. The Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Tax Department – Rajasthan High Court Posted by IBC Laws Editoron April 18, 2022July 20, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-High Courts Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
02Dec Once a resolution plan is duly approved by the AA under Section 31(1) of IBC, the claims as provided in the resolution plan shall stand frozen and all the parties including the Corporate Debtor, employees, members, creditors, including the Central Government, any State Government or any local authority, guarantors and other stakeholders shall be bound down by such plan – Ultratech Nathdwara Cement Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan – Rajasthan High Court Posted by IBC Laws Editoron December 2, 2021July 20, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-High Courts, Newsletter-IBC Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
18Sep Mr Amit Jain RP of Neesa Leisure Ltd. Vs. Rajasthan State Industrial and Investment Corporation – Rajasthan High Court Posted by IBC Laws Editoron September 18, 2021December 11, 2022in IBC-Case Laws-High Courts Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
01Sep Whether proceedings under Section 37 of the Rajasthan Stamps Act could be continued while IBC proceedings have been initiated – Alchemist Asset and Reconstruction Company Ltd. Vs. Deputy Inspector General, Registration and Stamp (Tax Evasion) Rajasthan – Rajasthan High Court Posted by IBC Laws Editoron September 1, 2021May 22, 2022in IBC-Case Laws-High Courts Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
