Is moratorium under Section 14(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 would apply to non-corporate debtor/debtors dealt under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act? – M/s PVS Memorial Hospital Vs. Dr. Satheesh Iype – Kerala High Court

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.

 

Section 65 of IBC has to be read as enabling provision to reject an application even on proving of debt and default Section 10 Application is not to be obligatorily admitted – Wave Megacity Centre Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Rakesh Taneja & Ors. – NCLAT New Delhi

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.

 

The criminal liability of natural persons in case of complaint filed under Section 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 would survive, but would not be attracted against the company during the moratorium period under Section 14 of IBC – M/s. Nag Leathers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/s. Muzain Hides – High Court of Madras

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.

 

NCLAT allows extension of CIRP period beyond 330 days to invite Project Wise Resolution Plan of real estate dividing entire assets into eight Projects – Whispering Tower Flat Owner Welfare Association and Ors. Vs. Abhay Narayan Manudhane, RP of Corporate Debtor and Ors. – NCLAT New Delhi

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.