12Dec Since the demised premises ceased to be the property of the Corporate Debtor much prior to the initiation of CIRP, therefore, it cannot be covered under Section 14 much less 14(1)(d) of the Code – Neesa Leisure Ltd. Vs. Rajasthan State Industrial and Investment Corporation – NCLAT New Delhi Posted by IBC Laws Editoron December 12, 2022July 17, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-NCLAT, Newsletter-IBC Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
