15Sep The documents being balance sheets and settlement offers relating to acknowledgement claiming benefit of Section 18 of Limitation Act, 1963 could be accepted even at the appellate stage – Axis Bank Ltd. Vs. Naren Sheth & Anr. – Supreme Court Posted by IBC Laws Editoron September 15, 2023November 25, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-Supreme Court, Newsletter-IBC Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
17Mar A creditor enjoys the protection of a security interest he cannot be treated any higher than the other creditors – ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs. Mr. PratimBayal, The RP (for BKM Industries Ltd.) – NCLT Kolkata Bench Posted by IBC Laws Editoron March 17, 2023November 7, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-NCLT, Newsletter-IBC Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
14Mar In order to make a person vicariously liable for an offence committed by company under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the first and foremost pre-condition is that the said person should either be a signatory of the cheque or should be holding a position in the company and should also be responsible for the conduct of the business of the company while holding such designation – Ridhima Jain Vs. M/s Interarch Building Products Pvt. Ltd. – Delhi High Court Posted by IBC Laws Editoron March 14, 2023March 14, 2023in Case Laws-NI-High Courts, Newsletter-IBC Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
09Feb In case of realisation of Security Interest u/s 52(1)(b) of IBC, whether a Secured Creditor can charge interest till the date of realisation of sale proceeds or he is confined to the amount of principal and interest as claimed in Form D – DBS Bank India Ltd. Vs. Kuldeep Verma, Liquidator of Eastern Gases Ltd. – NCLAT New Delhi Posted by IBC Laws Editoron February 9, 2023July 20, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-NCLAT, Newsletter-IBC Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
27Aug IBC would prevail over the Customs Act, 1962 and once moratorium is imposed in terms of Sections 14 or 33(5) of the IBC, the Custom authority only has a limited jurisdiction to assess/determine the quantum of customs duty and other levies – Sundaresh Bhatt, Liquidator of ABG Shipyard Vs. Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs – Supreme Court of India Posted by Ramroopon August 27, 2022July 21, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-Supreme Court, Newsletter-IBC Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
29Apr Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India, Ministry of Corporate Affairs & 2 Ors. – Bombay High Court Posted by IBC Laws Editoron April 29, 2022November 6, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-High Courts Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
24Feb Once the Corporate Debtor was admitted into CIRP and Resolution Plan is approved, yet NCLT is vested with the jurisdiction to entertain the Petition related to Personal guarantees of Corporate Debtor – State Bank of India Vs. Ms. Savita Satish Gowda – NCLT Mumbai Bench Posted by Ramroopon February 24, 2022July 21, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-NCLT, Newsletter-IBC Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
01Feb Bindu Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sonu Jain, Liquidator of Falcon Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. – NCLAT New Delhi Posted by IBC Laws Editoron February 1, 2022July 24, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-NCLAT Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
27Dec A question whether an asset secured by the borrower is actually owned by him or not, can not be within the domain of a DRAT under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 & shall primarily be within the jurisdiction of the Civil Court – Sagar Singh Damor Vs. Deepak Sharma and Others – Madhya Pradesh High Court Posted by IBC Laws Editoron December 27, 2021December 27, 2021in Case Laws-SARFAESI-High Courts, Newsletter-IBC Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
29Jun Jet Airways Resolution Plan – Ashish Chhawchharia RP for Jet Airways (India) Ltd. – NCLT Mumbai Bench Posted by IBC Laws Editoron June 29, 2021November 1, 2022in IBC-Case Laws-NCLT Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
