25Sep The clean slate principle – The Successful Resolution Applicant cannot be insisted to pay the arrears payable by the Corporate Debtor for the grant of an electricity connection in her/his name – Tata Power Western Odisha Distribution Ltd. (TPWODL) & Anr. Vs. Jagannath Sponge Pvt. Ltd. Director – Supreme Court Posted by IBC Laws Editoron September 25, 2023November 25, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-Supreme Court, Newsletter-IBC Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
17Mar Service of guarantee invocation notice before filing the application under Section 7 of IBC against a Corporate Guarantor on default by principal borrower – State Bank of India Vs. Shaliwahan Farms Pvt. Ltd. – NCLT Mumbai Bench Posted by IBC Laws Editoron March 17, 2023April 3, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-NCLT, Newsletter-IBC Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
06Jan R. P. Casting Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Registrar of Companies – NCLAT New Delhi Posted by IBC Laws Editoron January 6, 2023February 9, 2023in Companies Act-NCLAT Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
29Aug Once Liquidator applies to the NCLT for the decision to sell the movable and immovable assets of the Corporate Debtor in liquidation by adopting a particular mode of sale and NCLT grants approval to such a decision, there is no provision in the IBC that empowers the NCLAT to suo motu conduct a judicial review of the said decision – R.K. Industries (Unit-II) LLP Vs. H.R. Commercials Pvt. Ltd. and Other – Supreme Court of India Posted by Ramroopon August 29, 2022July 24, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-Supreme Court, Newsletter-IBC Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
06May Rule 8(5) of the Securitisation Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 does not contemplate to get a fresh valuation report for each and every sale notice – M/s. Soumya Engineering Vs. The Chief Manager Indian Bank – Karnataka High Court Posted by IBC Laws Editoron May 6, 2022May 6, 2022in Case Laws-SARFAESI-High Courts, Newsletter-IBC Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
24Feb Dispute with regard to the inspection report/quality of goods is required to be decided/adjudicated by a regular Civil Court – Sparc Industries Vs. G L Engineering Industries Pvt. Ltd. – NCLT Mumbai Bench Posted by Ramroopon February 24, 2022November 6, 2022in IBC-Case Laws-NCLT Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
31Jan Stable Packaging Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Suresh Kumar Jain – NCLAT New Delhi Posted by IBC Laws Editoron January 31, 2022July 24, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-NCLAT Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
31Dec The principles applied in Corporate Insolvency cannot be applied to Personal Insolvency. Recovery proceedings or proceedings under Section 96 of the IBC, 2016 would not absolve the borrower who has been found to be a wilful defaulter – Adarsh Jhunjhunjwala Vs. State Bank of India & Anr. – High Court of Calcutta Posted by IBC Laws Editoron December 31, 2021July 17, 2023in Case Laws-SARFAESI-High Courts, IBC-Case Laws-High Courts, Newsletter-IBC Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
04Jul Janhavi Dixit Vs. Mr. Rajat Mukherjee Liquidator of Enviiro Bulkk Handling Systems Pvt. Ltd. – NCLT Mumbai Bench Posted by IBC Laws EditorSVon July 4, 2021February 22, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-NCLT Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
04Mar Mr. Rajendrakumar Kundanmal Jain Vs. Mr. Vijal A. Jain Proprietor – EPPAJ India – NCLAT New Delhi Posted by IBC Laws Editoron March 4, 2021May 25, 2022in IBC-Case Laws-NCLAT Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
