The legal implementation of the Resolution plan u/s 30(2)(e) is in no way impacted by the CIRP process followed in the First COC meeting and therefore cannot be considered as an objection us 30(2)(e) as it does not impact the implementation of the Resolution plan – Mr. Amit Sangal, Proprietor of Nitin Plastic Vs. Mr. Kairav Anil Trivedi, IRP/RP of Prince MFG Industries Pvt. Ltd. – NCLT Mumbai Bench

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.

 

Whether once an officer of the department is appointed as an Arbitrator considering the arbitration clause, whether his mandate to continue the arbitration proceedings shall come to an end on his retirement? – Laxmi Continental Construction Co. Vs. State of U.P. & Anr. – Supreme Court

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.

 

If in a matter, the Adjudicating Authority finds it necessary to hear the particular side or particular person in order to give them opportunity to respond, it is more appropriate to give option to the concerned parties/person to appear in person or through Advocate – M/s. Solutions Business Centre LLP Vs. Renu Kumar – NCLAT New Delhi

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.