The delay in filing Appeal u/s 42 of IBC can be condoned even in the absence of the application u/s 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 but there shall at least be an oral prayer for condonation of delay, the delay cannot be condoned Suo-Moto – Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Ltd. Vs. Priyadarsini Ltd. Rep by Liquidator, Mr. Krishna Mohan Gollamudi – NCLT Hyderabad Bench

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.

 

Use of electricity for running the printing business of the Corporate Debtor cannot get protection as essential supply u/s 14 of the Code r/w CIRP Regulation 32 – Harish Taneja, RP of  Perfact Color Digital Prints Pvt. Ltd.  Vs. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam – NCLAT New Delhi

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.

 

An award has been passed by the Arbitral Tribunal against the Corporate Debtor & Corporate Debtor has moved an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 before the Hon’ble High Court and the matter is pending, it cannot be alleged that there is a default and application under Section 7 was not maintainable – M/s. Loyal Credit and Investment Ltd. Vs. M/s. Cosmopolis Properties Pvt. Ltd. – NCLAT New Delhi

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.