Under the Arbitration Act, 1996, the award is required to be a reasoned one unless the parties agree that no reasons are to be given or the award is based on agreement as per Sec. 31(3) – The Court could not substitute its own decision for the decision of the Arbitrator on merits – State of Orissa Vs. Samantary Constn. Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. – Supreme Court

Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me     Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here to […]

Under the Arbitration Act, 1996, the award is required to be a reasoned one unless the parties agree that no reasons are to be given or the award is based on agreement as per Sec. 31(3) – The Court could not substitute its own decision for the decision of the Arbitrator on merits – State of Orissa Vs. Samantary Constn. Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. – Supreme Court Read Post »