The Adjudicating Authority (Tribunal) in Law is not empowered to order an investigation directly – Vijay Pal Garg & Ors. Vs. Pooja Bahry (Liquidator in the matter of Gee Ispat Pvt. Ltd. – NCLAT

NCLAT has held that this Tribunal on a careful consideration of respective contentions and also keeping in mind a prime fact that the Tribunal/Adjudicating Authority is guided by the Principles of Natural justice and is to follow the procedure prescribed u/s 213(b) of the Companies Act comes to an ‘irresistible’ and inescapable conclusion that the Adjudicating Authority (Tribunal) in Law is not empowered to order an investigation directly, to be carried out by the Central Government. An Adjudicating Authority (Tribunal) as a competent / Appropriate authority in terms of Section 213 of the Companies Act has an option to issue notice in regard to the charges/allegations levelled against the promoters and others (including the Appellants) of course after following the due procedure enshrined u/s 213 of the Companies Act, 2013. In case an exfacie/prima facie case is made out, then, the Tribunal is empowered to refer the matter to the Central Government for an investigation by the Inspectors and upon such investigation, if any action is required to be taken and if the Central Government subjectively opines that the subject matter in issue needs an investigation, through the Serious Fraud Investigation Office, it may proceed in accordance with Law.

The Adjudicating Authority (Tribunal) in Law is not empowered to order an investigation directly – Vijay Pal Garg & Ors. Vs. Pooja Bahry (Liquidator in the matter of Gee Ispat Pvt. Ltd. – NCLAT Read Post »