Section 2 of IBC provides that the provisions of the Code apply, inter alia, to “proprietorship firms”. Further the definition of “person” in Section 3(23) of IBC is inclusive definition- Neeta Saha vs. Mr. Ram Niwas Gupta -NCLAT

The Corporate Debtor took up a defence that the Application was filed in the name of sole proprietorship firm and it was not a legal entity under the definition of “person” under Section 3(23) of IBC. It was also claimed that the Operational Creditor had added interest which was not stipulated in the agreement. The Adjudicating Authority, after hearing the parties, has admitted the Application under Section 9 of IBC and against the said admission, present Appeal has been filed.

Section 2 of IBC provides that the provisions of the Code apply, inter alia, to “proprietorship firms”. Further the definition of “person” in Section 3(23) of IBC is inclusive definition- Neeta Saha vs. Mr. Ram Niwas Gupta -NCLAT Read Post »