The Section 60(2) does not in any way prohibit filing of insolvency proceedings under Section 95 of the Code against Personal Guarantor even if no proceeding are pending against the Corporate Debtor before NCLT – State Bank of India Vs. Mahendra Kumar Jajodia – NCLAT New Delhi

NCLAT holds that Sub-Section 1 of Section 60 provides that Adjudicating Authority for the corporate persons including corporate debtors and personal guarantors shall be the NCLT. The Sub-Section 2 of Section 60 requires that where a CIRP or Liquidation Process of the Corporate Debtor is pending before ‘a’ National Company Law Tribunal the application relating to CIRP of the Corporate Guarantor or Personal Guarantor as the case may be of such Corporate Debtor shall be filed before ‘such’ National Company Law Tribunal. The purpose and object of the sub-section 2 of Section 60 of the Code is that when proceedings are pending in ‘a’ National Company Law Tribunal, any proceeding against Corporate Guarantor should also be filed before ‘such’ National Company Law Tribunal. The idea is that both proceedings be entertained by one and the same NCLT. The sub-section 2 of Section 60 does not in any way prohibit filing of proceedings under Section 95 of the Code even if no proceeding are pending before NCLT.

The Section 60(2) does not in any way prohibit filing of insolvency proceedings under Section 95 of the Code against Personal Guarantor even if no proceeding are pending against the Corporate Debtor before NCLT – State Bank of India Vs. Mahendra Kumar Jajodia – NCLAT New Delhi Read Post »