Mr. Amit Gupta Vs. Mr. Anil Kohli RP of Dunar Foods Ltd.

Resolution Professional and the representative of the CoC who are the Chairman/Members of the Monitoring Committee should assist the Resolution Applicant in sorting out the issues pending at various forums be it Excise Authority, Enforcement Directorate etc. – Amit Gupta Vs. Anil Kohli RP for Dunar Foods Ltd. – NCLAT New Delhi

NCLAT held that the CIRP shall mandatorily be completed within a period of 330 days from the insolvency commencement date. Including the extension of CIRP Period and time taken in legal proceedings. Liability for prior offences etc. particularly removing/lifting attachments/liens/charges/encumbrances existing prior to CIRP needs to be dealt with in accordance with the provisions of Section 32(A) of the Code. It is also not in dispute that the object of the IBC would be defeated if the responsibility for prior offences is put on the Resolution Appellant. The Resolution Appellant is supposed to get a clean slate and all dues of the Corporate Debtor prior to commencement of CIRP stand extinguished. The Successful Resolution Applicant is supposed to get all the assets of the Corporate Debtor free from any encumbrances and would be available for use by the Resolution Applicant without any fetters or brevity and clarity.

Resolution Professional and the representative of the CoC who are the Chairman/Members of the Monitoring Committee should assist the Resolution Applicant in sorting out the issues pending at various forums be it Excise Authority, Enforcement Directorate etc. – Amit Gupta Vs. Anil Kohli RP for Dunar Foods Ltd. – NCLAT New Delhi Read Post »

Scroll to Top