Union Bank of India Vs. Dinkar T. Venkatasubramanian & Ors.

NCLAT is not vested with any power to review the judgment, however, in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction NCLAT can entertain an application for recall of judgment on sufficient grounds – Union Bank of India (Erstwhile Corporation Bank) Vs. Dinkar T. Venkatasubramanian & Ors. – NCLAT New Delhi

NCLAT held that the three-member bench judgment in Agarwal Coal Corporation Pvt. Ltd. and K.L.J Resources Ltd. & Anr. observing that the Tribunal does not have power to recall cannot be approved. The three-member bench judgments of this Tribunal insofar as observation that this Tribunal has no power to review, no exception can be taken to that part of the judgment. We, however, hold that the judgment laying down that this Tribunal has no power to recall the judgment does not lay down correct law. It is also held that this Tribunal is not vested with any power to review the judgment, however, in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction this Tribunal can entertain an application for recall of judgment on sufficient grounds.

NCLAT is not vested with any power to review the judgment, however, in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction NCLAT can entertain an application for recall of judgment on sufficient grounds – Union Bank of India (Erstwhile Corporation Bank) Vs. Dinkar T. Venkatasubramanian & Ors. – NCLAT New Delhi Read Post »

Scroll to Top