18Apr Viom Infra Ventures Ltd. Vs. Bahula Infotech Pvt. Ltd. – NCLT Kolkata Bench Posted by IBC Laws Editoron April 18, 2023July 6, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-NCLT Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
24Feb An order of the Hon’ble High Court shall be binding on the Adjudicating Authority (Tribunal) established under Section 419(4) of the Companies Act, 2013 exercising Territorial Jurisdiction – M/s. Indra Marshal Power Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/s. Akshaya Irrigation Products Pvt. Ltd. – NCLAT Chennai Posted by IBC Laws Editoron February 24, 2023July 24, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-NCLAT, Newsletter-IBC Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
21Feb Share application money does not fall under the definition of Financial Debt of IBC – Naman Global Impex Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Rathod Pharmachem Pvt. Ltd. – NCLT Ahmedabad Bench Posted by IBC Laws Editoron February 21, 2023February 20, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-NCLT, Newsletter-IBC Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
21Feb PMLA would cease to have the power to attach the property at this juncture when the order of the Liquidation under IBC has already been passed – Mr. Satyendra P. Khorania Liquidator of M/s Emgee Cables and Communications Ltd. Vs. Deputy Director, Jaipur Zonal Office, Directorate of Enforcement – NCLT Jaipur Bench Posted by IBC Laws Editoron February 21, 2023July 20, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-NCLT, Newsletter-IBC Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
09Feb Since an application under Section 9 of IBC cannot be treated as suit, bar of Section 69(2) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 is not attracted – Rourkela Steel Syndicate Vs. Metistech Fabricators Pvt. Ltd. – NCLAT New Delhi Posted by IBC Laws Editoron February 9, 2023March 2, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-NCLAT, Newsletter-IBC Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
27Jan Adjudicating Authority by adopting a process of taking two bids cannot conclude the sale of a Corporate Debtor without giving an opportunity to Liquidator to take steps for private sale – State Bank of India Vs. Bhuvee Stenovate Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. – NCLAT New Delhi Posted by IBC Laws Editoron January 27, 2023July 24, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-NCLAT, Newsletter-IBC Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
25Jan Surendra Singh Hada & Ors. Vs. Arfat Petrochemicals Pvt. Ltd. – NCLAT New Delhi Posted by IBC Laws Editoron January 25, 2023October 19, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-NCLAT Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
24Jan Bank of Baroda Vs. Asahi Industries Ltd. & Ors. – NCLAT New Delhi Posted by IBC Laws Editoron January 24, 2023July 15, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-NCLAT Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
18Jan Avoidance applications under IBC can be heard after conclusion of CIRP and benefits derived from adjudication will be appropriated by Creditors and Resolution Professional will pursue the avoidance applications since he is only functus officio vis-à-vis CIRP and not avoidance applications – Tata Steel BSL Ltd. Vs. Venus Recruiterprivate Ltd. & Ors – Delhi High Court Posted by IBC Laws Editoron January 18, 2023November 1, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-High Courts, Newsletter-IBC Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
12Jan A bare perusal of Sections 17, 18, 19(19), 31 and 34 of Recovery of Debts & Bankruptcy Act, 1993 shows that the DRT is having exclusive jurisdiction to deal with the recovery of the secured creditors and is having an overriding effect over all other laws – The Specified Undertaking of The Unit Trust of India Vs. M/s Derby Textiles Ltd. – Rajasthan High Court Posted by IBC Laws Editoron January 12, 2023July 16, 2023in Case Laws-SARFAESI-High Courts, Companies Act-High Courts, Newsletter-IBC Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
