High Court while exercising of its writ jurisdiction thus have the power to review its order, however the power is subject to the limits which is otherwise prescribed or envisaged under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure – National Highways Authority of India Vs. Ashutosh Agrawal – Chhattisgarh High Court

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.

 

Whether the applicant can be permitted to adduce evidence to support the ground relating to Public Policy in an application filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996? – M/s Alpine Housing Development Corporation Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Ashok S. Dhariwal and Others – Supreme Court

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.

 

Merely because an Operational Creditor approached NCLT u/s 9 of IBC before seeking appointment of Arbitration, it cannot be said that he was indulging in Forum Shopping – Brilltech Engineers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Pvt. Ltd. – Delhi High Court

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.

 

Whether the “sum” awarded under Section 31(7)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 would include the interest pendente lite or not? – Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation – Supreme Court

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.

 

The grounds of challenge u/s 34(1) and (2) of Arbitration Ac, 1996 are distinct and independent from the grounds which are generally accepted by the Court for stay of an award under section 36(2) – Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. Vs. Optimal Power Synergy India Pvt. Ltd. – Calcutta High Court

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.