The expression “fundamental policy of Indian law” in Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be interpreted in wide terms to include violation of any Act or Statute – Oil India Ltd. Vs. Techno Canada Inc. – Delhi High Court

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.

 

Entire arbitration award need not be set aside due to the perversity in one specific claim or counter-Claim – Bawana Infra Development Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Delhi State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. (“DSIIDC”) – Delhi High Court

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.

 

An award passed without sufficient reasoning/in contravention of Section 31 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, cannot be sustained in the eyes of the law – The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. HCL Infosystems Ltd. – Delhi High Court

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.

 

The court does not possess the power to modify an arbitral award while hearing a challenge under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, however, while exercising power under Section 34 can set aside an award partially – Amazing Research Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Krishna Pharma – Delhi High Court

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.

 

Once a decision is made in application under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, the Court has no power to remit the arbitration matter to the Arbitrator – M/s. Sri Rama Constructions Vs. M/s. Max Infra (I) Ltd. – Telangana High Court

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.