Scope of interference by a Court in an appeal u/s 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, in examining an order, setting aside or refusing to set aside an award, is restricted and subject to the same grounds as the challenge u/s 34 – Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd. Vs. Chenab Bridge Project Undertaking – Supreme Court

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.

 

Court cannot reduce rate of interest awarded in an arbitration award and is powerless to modify award and can only set aside partially or wholly – M/s. Larsen Air Conditioning and Refrigration Company Vs. Union of India & Ors. – Supreme Court

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.

 

No Constitutional Court can issue a writ of mandamus to a legislature to enact a law on a particular subject in a particular manner – Union of India & Ors. Vs. K. Pushpavanam & Ors. – Supreme Court

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.