In conclusion, the realm of international commercial arbitration presents a complex interplay among the expansive interpretation of the term “commercial”, the specific delineation of what falls within its purview and what is excluded as non-arbitrable. While the judiciary in various States have generally leaned towards a broad interpretation of “commercial” matters, a more restrictive interpretation has been adopted in relation to employment disputes. In other words, the jurisprudence surrounding international commercial arbitration is embroiled in a tension between inclusivity and restriction, particularly concerning labour or employment disputes. While employment contracts may inherently involve commercial elements, such as the exchange of services for remuneration, courts have often hesitated to categorize them as purely commercial in nature. Instead, they have recognized the unique nature of employment relationships and the potential implications for labour rights and public policy. Thus, it is certain that while certain disputes arising from employment agreements may indeed be arbitrable, particularly those concerning breaches of contract or internal company policies, matters affecting broader public interest or collective labour rights or class action tend to fall outside the scope of international commercial arbitration. Still, there is a impending need for more clarity on inclusion of international employment disputes within the framework of International Commercial Arbitration. Given that Arbitration is a vital tool for resolving disputes swiftly and amicably in international commerce, it is imperative to continue refining its applicability to ensure equitable outcomes for all parties involved.