16Oct Condonation of delay being a discretionary power available to courts, exercise of discretion must necessarily depend upon the sufficiency of the cause shown and the degree of acceptability of the explanation, the length of delay being immaterial – Sheo Raj Singh (Deceased) Through Lrs. & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Anr. – Supreme Court Posted by IBC Laws Editoron October 16, 2023November 25, 2023in Arbitration-Supreme Court, Case Laws-NI-Supreme Court, Case Laws-RERA-Supreme Court, Case Laws-SARFAESI-Supreme Court, CCA-Commercial Courts Act Case Laws (High Court &Supreme Court), Companies Act-Supreme Court, CP- Supreme Court Case Laws, IBC-Case Laws-Supreme Court, Indian International Arbitration Centre Act Case Laws(High Court &Supreme Court), Newsletter-Arbitration Case, Newsletter-IBC Case, Newsletter-RDB NI Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
06Oct The Union of India shall ensure that on or before 15.11.2023, all tribunals are provided with requisite infrastructure for hybrid hearings – Sarvesh Mathur Vs. The Registrar General High Court of Punjab and Haryana – Supreme Court Posted by IBC Laws Editoron October 6, 2023November 25, 2023in Arbitration-Supreme Court, Case Laws-NI-Supreme Court, Case Laws-SARFAESI-Supreme Court, CCA-Commercial Courts Act Case Laws (High Court &Supreme Court), Companies Act-Supreme Court, CP- Supreme Court Case Laws, IBC-Case Laws-Supreme Court, Indian International Arbitration Centre Act Case Laws(High Court &Supreme Court) Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
27Sep In computing the period of limitation for any suit, appeal, application or proceeding, the period from 15.03.2020 till 02.10.2021 shall stand excluded – In Re: Cognizance for Extension of Limitation – Supreme Court Posted by IBC Laws Editoron September 27, 2021July 16, 2023in Arbitration-Supreme Court, CP- Supreme Court Case Laws, IBC-Case Laws-Supreme Court, Limitation Act Case Laws, Newsletter-IBC Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
22Mar All proceedings instituted before 20 July 2020 under the Consumer Protection Act 1986 shall continue to be heard by the fora corresponding to those designated under the Consumer Protection Act 1986 and not be transferred in terms of the new pecuniary limits established under the Consumer Protection Act 2019 – Neena Aneja & Anr. Vs. Jai Prakash Associates Ltd. – SC Posted by IBC Laws Editoron March 22, 2021March 23, 2021in CP- Supreme Court Case Laws Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
08Mar NBCC (India) Limited Vs. Shri Ram Trivedi – SC Posted by IBC Laws Editoron March 8, 2021March 28, 2021in CP- Supreme Court Case Laws Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
19Feb Irrespective of the value of the articles placed inside the locker, the bank is under a separate obligation to ensure that proper procedures are followed while allotting and operating the lockers – Amitabha Dasgupta Vs. United Bank of India & Ors. – SC Posted by IBC Laws EditorSVon February 19, 2021March 8, 2021in CP- Supreme Court Case Laws Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
18Feb Tata Motors Ltd. Vs. Antonio Paulo Vaz and Anr. – SC Posted by IBC Laws EditorSVon February 18, 2021March 8, 2021in CP- Supreme Court Case Laws Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
11Feb There was no mandate that in all the cases were the written statement was submitted beyond the stipulated period of 45 days, the delay must be condoned and the written statement must be taken on record – M/s Daddy’s Builders Pvt. Ltd. & Another Vs. Manisha Bhargava and Another – SC Posted by IBC Laws EditorSVon February 11, 2021March 8, 2021in CP- Supreme Court Case Laws Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
