Rule 8(6)(f) of the Security Enforcement Rules protects the interest of the intending purchaser to be put on notice as to encumbrance as otherwise, he or she would be purchasing property, and simultaneously buying litigation as well, and the intending purchaser may not bid in the event, if he or she came to know any encumbrance over the property – Llovegeet Dhuria Vs. State Bank of India and Others – Punjab & Haryana High Court

Access restricted!

In order to access this content, you're required to login to your account. In case you've already logged in, you are facing access issue because of:

  • you may not have a subscription of the Module/iPlan(iPlan-1, iPlan-2 or iPlan-3) in which this content is published. Click here for more details; or
  • your subscription may expire, you can check here status of your existing subscription. Click here for renewal discount(limited period offer).

Click here to know more about subscription features and our reporting structure.

If you are still facing any issue in login, WhatsApp to +91 9577994433.

Note: If you can't remember your username, you can use your registered email address as “Username” in login form.

M/s A.S. Nutratech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Central Bank of India – Chhattisgarh High Court

Access restricted!

In order to access this content, you're required to login to your account. In case you've already logged in, you are facing access issue because of:

  • you may not have a subscription of the Module/iPlan(iPlan-1, iPlan-2 or iPlan-3) in which this content is published. Click here for more details; or
  • your subscription may expire, you can check here status of your existing subscription. Click here for renewal discount(limited period offer).

Click here to know more about subscription features and our reporting structure.

If you are still facing any issue in login, WhatsApp to +91 9577994433.

Note: If you can't remember your username, you can use your registered email address as “Username” in login form.

Under Section 22(1)(g) of the RDB Act 1993 the DRT was competent to restore the Securitization Application(SA) by imposition of reasonable cost. This power of restoration of SA as per Section 22(2)(g) cannot be confused with the power flowing from Section 19(25) of the same Act – M/s. Ganpat Pannalal Vs. State Bank of India – Madhya Pradesh High Court

Access restricted!

In order to access this content, you're required to login to your account. In case you've already logged in, you are facing access issue because of:

  • you may not have a subscription of the Module/iPlan(iPlan-1, iPlan-2 or iPlan-3) in which this content is published. Click here for more details; or
  • your subscription may expire, you can check here status of your existing subscription. Click here for renewal discount(limited period offer).

Click here to know more about subscription features and our reporting structure.

If you are still facing any issue in login, WhatsApp to +91 9577994433.

Note: If you can't remember your username, you can use your registered email address as “Username” in login form.

Smt Pramila Dosi Vs. IDFC First Bank Ltd. – Madhya Pradesh High Court

Access restricted!

In order to access this content, you're required to login to your account. In case you've already logged in, you are facing access issue because of:

  • you may not have a subscription of the Module/iPlan(iPlan-1, iPlan-2 or iPlan-3) in which this content is published. Click here for more details; or
  • your subscription may expire, you can check here status of your existing subscription. Click here for renewal discount(limited period offer).

Click here to know more about subscription features and our reporting structure.

If you are still facing any issue in login, WhatsApp to +91 9577994433.

Note: If you can't remember your username, you can use your registered email address as “Username” in login form.

Satishkumar Surendra Shetty Vs. The District Collector – Bombay High Court

Access restricted!

In order to access this content, you're required to login to your account. In case you've already logged in, you are facing access issue because of:

  • you may not have a subscription of the Module/iPlan(iPlan-1, iPlan-2 or iPlan-3) in which this content is published. Click here for more details; or
  • your subscription may expire, you can check here status of your existing subscription. Click here for renewal discount(limited period offer).

Click here to know more about subscription features and our reporting structure.

If you are still facing any issue in login, WhatsApp to +91 9577994433.

Note: If you can't remember your username, you can use your registered email address as “Username” in login form.

Priority in recovering dues from a company that has become non-functional but has not been wound up – Khandelwal Tube Mill Kamgar Sangh Vs. The Government of Maharashtra – Bombay High Court

Access restricted!

In order to access this content, you're required to login to your account. In case you've already logged in, you are facing access issue because of:

  • you may not have a subscription of the Module/iPlan(iPlan-1, iPlan-2 or iPlan-3) in which this content is published. Click here for more details; or
  • your subscription may expire, you can check here status of your existing subscription. Click here for renewal discount(limited period offer).

Click here to know more about subscription features and our reporting structure.

If you are still facing any issue in login, WhatsApp to +91 9577994433.

Note: If you can't remember your username, you can use your registered email address as “Username” in login form.

Claim of two banks on same goods – Dena Bank Vs. M/s Siddharth Pulses through Proprietor and others – Bombay High Court

Access restricted!

In order to access this content, you're required to login to your account. In case you've already logged in, you are facing access issue because of:

  • you may not have a subscription of the Module/iPlan(iPlan-1, iPlan-2 or iPlan-3) in which this content is published. Click here for more details; or
  • your subscription may expire, you can check here status of your existing subscription. Click here for renewal discount(limited period offer).

Click here to know more about subscription features and our reporting structure.

If you are still facing any issue in login, WhatsApp to +91 9577994433.

Note: If you can't remember your username, you can use your registered email address as “Username” in login form.

When a specific remedy is available to the aggrieved party, the High Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution is not justified in interfering with the orders of the DRT to examine the correctness of the rejection of the applications – Sh. Vinod Kumar Vs. Himachal Pradesh Financial Corporation – Himachal Pradesh High Court

Access restricted!

In order to access this content, you're required to login to your account. In case you've already logged in, you are facing access issue because of:

  • you may not have a subscription of the Module/iPlan(iPlan-1, iPlan-2 or iPlan-3) in which this content is published. Click here for more details; or
  • your subscription may expire, you can check here status of your existing subscription. Click here for renewal discount(limited period offer).

Click here to know more about subscription features and our reporting structure.

If you are still facing any issue in login, WhatsApp to +91 9577994433.

Note: If you can't remember your username, you can use your registered email address as “Username” in login form.

Whether Executive Magistrate can be delegated the powers of the District Magistrate under section 14 of the SERFAESI Act, 2002 to take possession of secured assets – Joy Kali Oil Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors. – Calcutta High Court

Access restricted!

In order to access this content, you're required to login to your account. In case you've already logged in, you are facing access issue because of:

  • you may not have a subscription of the Module/iPlan(iPlan-1, iPlan-2 or iPlan-3) in which this content is published. Click here for more details; or
  • your subscription may expire, you can check here status of your existing subscription. Click here for renewal discount(limited period offer).

Click here to know more about subscription features and our reporting structure.

If you are still facing any issue in login, WhatsApp to +91 9577994433.

Note: If you can't remember your username, you can use your registered email address as “Username” in login form.

Mahindra Singh Rana Vs. Vijay Kumar Jain – Madhya Pradesh High Court

Access restricted!

In order to access this content, you're required to login to your account. In case you've already logged in, you are facing access issue because of:

  • you may not have a subscription of the Module/iPlan(iPlan-1, iPlan-2 or iPlan-3) in which this content is published. Click here for more details; or
  • your subscription may expire, you can check here status of your existing subscription. Click here for renewal discount(limited period offer).

Click here to know more about subscription features and our reporting structure.

If you are still facing any issue in login, WhatsApp to +91 9577994433.

Note: If you can't remember your username, you can use your registered email address as “Username” in login form.