The Ld. Advocates/ Authorized Representatives/ Parties-in-Person in all pending matters filed before 04.01.2021, may in advance e-file their pleadings along with their annexures/ documents – NCLAT New Delhi notice dated 04.01.2022

In order to curtail the delays, the Ld. Advocates/ Authorized Representatives/ Parties-in-Person in all pending matters filed before 04.01.2021, may in advance e-file their pleadings along with their annexures/ documents. The online filing and hard copies filed earlier must match with proper pagination.

EPFO is more than a stakeholder in the Liquidation Process – By Mr. Chidambaram Ramesh

In some cases, the Liquidators have reportedly issued notice to the EPFO for participation in the stakeholders’ consultation committee meeting, treating them as operational creditors or Government agencies. In general terms, almost everyone associated with the Corporate Debtor is considered a stakeholder. However, Section 2(k) of the IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016 provides for a definition of the term ‘stakeholder.’ It reads, “stakeholders” means the stakeholders entitled to distribution of proceeds under section 53. This gives rise to a larger question: Does the EPFO come within the meaning of ‘stakeholder’ for the I & B Code and the connected liquidation process? This article is intended to address this concern.

Impact of Covid-19 on Insolvency Laws in India – By Adv. Himanshi Srivastava

The insolvency ordinance also does not offer pending corporate insolvency proceedings any reprieve or ability to resubmit updated plans or revised valuations, which seems reasonable given the current economic situation. While the government's goal is to shield businesses, promoters, and directors from unjustified liability during these extraordinary times, it must also ensure that the country does not devolve into a "defaulter's paradise." These are uncharted waters that necessitate constant re-evaluation and monitoring. The insolvency ordinance does not completely address all of the issues, but it appears to be a step in the right direction.

Analysis of Deluge Forex Reserved – By Mr. Abhijeet Kashyap

There is no one-size-fits-all definition of forex trade save anywhere on the planet. Most focal banks differ in terms of what they include, who they are responsible for, and how they view liquidity. The International Monetary Fund's definition has been accepted by national banks all over the world (Balance of Payments Manual, and Guidelines on Foreign Exchange Reserve Management, 2001).

Satya Prakash Bansal Vs. The Karur Vyasya Bank Ltd. – DRAT Delhi Bench

In order to access this content you need to login to your account or in case you've already logged in, you may need to subscribe an iPlan, visit here for detail.
If you are still facing any issue in login, WhatsApp us : +91 9577994433 or Click here to WhatsApp us.

The stay granted does not lead to automatic revival of the Company Petition which has been already closed by the Adjudicating Authority – Binay Kumar Singhania RP Genegrow Commercial Pvt. Ltd. – NCLAT New Delhi

In order to access this content you need to login to your account or in case you've already logged in, you may need to subscribe an iPlan, visit here for detail.
If you are still facing any issue in login, WhatsApp us : +91 9577994433 or Click here to WhatsApp us.

Reviewing Evolution of Applicability of Limitation Act, 1963 on IBC, 2016 – By Ms. Meghna Somani & Ms. Palak Jagetia

Authors in this piece, have discussed changes in position of law with respect to applicability of act on the proceedings of the code, specially in the light of the recent case of Sesh Nath Singh. Further, discussion is not just with regards to Section 14, but also encompasses a detailed review on specifics and applicability of Section 5 and 18 of the act.

App

Install
×