Related Posts
A scheme sanctioned by the Court u/s 391 & 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 was binding on the creditors whether such creditors assented to it or not. A contract between the creditor and the principal debtor by which the creditor compounds with the principal debtor, discharges the surety-Shri Kundanmal Dabriwala Vs. Haryana Financial Corporation and another -Punjab & Haryana High Court
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember…
The surety’s obligation to pay would arise immediately on default committed by the principal debtor and once a cause of action against the surety has arisen the commencement of the running of time is not further postponed till the making of a demand-Montosh Kumar Chatterjee v Central Calcutta Bank Ltd.-Calcutta High Court
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember…
Innovative Industries Limited. Vs. Union of India and others- Bombay High Court
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember…