1050

The law has been crystallised that the requirement of the strict timeline provided in Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1996 has to be abided by filing a complete Petition | The limitation period under Section 34 cannot be stretched by parties through dummy filings which cannot be construed as valid as they are non-est – Union of India Vs. Panacea Biotec Ltd. – Delhi High Court

Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me     Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here to […]

The law has been crystallised that the requirement of the strict timeline provided in Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1996 has to be abided by filing a complete Petition | The limitation period under Section 34 cannot be stretched by parties through dummy filings which cannot be construed as valid as they are non-est – Union of India Vs. Panacea Biotec Ltd. – Delhi High Court Read Post »

Scroll to Top