NCLT is the only Adjudicating Authority in respect of Personal Guarantors to a Corporate Debtor where a CIRP or liquidation proceeding initiated against a Corporate Debtor is either pending before a NCLT or is already concluded | In absence of an “initiated” or “pending” or “concluded” CIRP against a Principal Borrower, an application u/s 95(1) against a Personal Guarantor will not be maintainable before the NCLT | The Recovery Proceedings will lie only before the DRT having territorial jurisdiction – UCO Bank Vs. Mr. Subrata Das – NCLT Kolkata Bench

In this important judgment, the Hon’ble NCLT Kolkata Bench concludes that:

a. In terms of Section 60(1) and (2) read with Section 179 of the I&B Code, NCLT is the only Adjudicating Authority in respect of Personal Guarantors to a Corporate Debtor where a CIRP or liquidation proceeding initiated against a corporate debtor is either pending before a NCLT or is already concluded.
b. In absence of an “initiated” or “pending” or “concluded” CIRP against a Principal Borrower, an application under Section 95(1) to initiate Insolvency Resolution Process against a Personal Guarantor to a Corporate Debtor will not be maintainable before the NCLT. The Recovery Proceedings will lie only before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) having territorial jurisdiction.

NCLT is the only Adjudicating Authority in respect of Personal Guarantors to a Corporate Debtor where a CIRP or liquidation proceeding initiated against a Corporate Debtor is either pending before a NCLT or is already concluded | In absence of an “initiated” or “pending” or “concluded” CIRP against a Principal Borrower, an application u/s 95(1) against a Personal Guarantor will not be maintainable before the NCLT | The Recovery Proceedings will lie only before the DRT having territorial jurisdiction – UCO Bank Vs. Mr. Subrata Das – NCLT Kolkata Bench Read Post »