162

Case of the liability of Banks which the imposters used to open an account to syphon off the amounts from the PPF accounts maintained with the SBI – State Bank of India Vs. Pooja Alias Vidhya P. Dhanade and Ors. – DRAT Mumbai

In this case, the impersonators had opened the accounts with the Canara Bank and the Mogaveera Co-operative Bank under the assumed name of the PPF account holders and had submitted the banker’s cheques for collection in those banks. The SBI discounted those banker’s cheques and the amounts came into the fictitious accounts of the PPF account holders fraudulently opened by the imposters with the Canara Bank and Mogaveera Co-operative Bank. The impostors withdrew the amounts and allegedly issued cheques and demand drafts in favour of the other defendants who had in collusion with them fraudulently appropriated the amounts.

Case of the liability of Banks which the imposters used to open an account to syphon off the amounts from the PPF accounts maintained with the SBI – State Bank of India Vs. Pooja Alias Vidhya P. Dhanade and Ors. – DRAT Mumbai Read Post »

Can a New Resolution Applicant be brought in or substituted with another Resolution Applicant, after approval of a Resolution Plan u/s 31 of IBC? – UV Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Aircel Ltd. – Supreme Court

A 3-Judge Bench of Hon’ble Supreme Court has upheld the decision of NCLAT where NCLAT fully agreed with the reasons given by the Adjudicating Authority for rejecting the application filed by the Appellant for substituting another Resolution Applicant in place of the Appellant. When plan of the Appellant as Resolution Applicant was approved, the Adjudicating Authority rightly refused to substitute another Resolution Applicant, in which order no infirmity is found

Can a New Resolution Applicant be brought in or substituted with another Resolution Applicant, after approval of a Resolution Plan u/s 31 of IBC? – UV Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Aircel Ltd. – Supreme Court Read Post »

Scroll to Top