253

The 4th defendant/Bank was cheated by the said Tholkappiayan by the production of forged Legal Heirship Certificate. If so, it is only the 4th defendant/Bank, which had to suffer the consequences and not the other lawful owners of the property, in this case, the sisters, who have to suffer the consequences. Therefore, I hold that the suit in respect of the permanent injunction was maintainable. Once the suit is maintainable, the plaintiffs have proved their case, that they are also the legal heirs of the said Roopavathi, who is the owner of the property and are entitled to 2/3rd of the share in the suit property.