Bansari Alloys Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Chief Manager and Authorised Officer, Indian Bank – DRAT Mumbai
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here […]
A Rajendra Vs. Gonugunta Madhusudhan Rao and Ors. – Supreme Court
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here
A Rajendra Vs. Gonugunta Madhusudhan Rao and Ors. – Supreme Court Read Post »
Mr. Sandeep Gupta Vs. Rajiv Bajaj RP – NCLAT New Delhi
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here
Mr. Sandeep Gupta Vs. Rajiv Bajaj RP – NCLAT New Delhi Read Post »
Proceedings in a complaint case under Section 138 of the NI Act are ordinarily to be conducted as a summary trial – Rahul Darbari Vs. Arun Kumar Khobragade and Ors. – Delhi High Court
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here
M/s. Hyde Engineering + Consulting, Inc. Vs. Mr. Karan Manocha – NCLAT Chennai
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here
M/s. Hyde Engineering + Consulting, Inc. Vs. Mr. Karan Manocha – NCLAT Chennai Read Post »
Mr. Hua Seng Chew (Chairman of Jai Radha Raman Education Society) Vs. Jai Radha Raman Education Society (Through its Chairman and President) & Ors. – Delhi High Court
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here
Supriyo Kumar Chaudhuri Vs. Punjab National Bank and Ors. – Supreme Court
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here
Supriyo Kumar Chaudhuri Vs. Punjab National Bank and Ors. – Supreme Court Read Post »
Himanshu Prafulchandra Varia Vs. M/s Varia Engineering Works Pvt. Ltd. – Gujarat High Court
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here
Ishrat Ali Vs. The Registrar, National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench – Supreme Court
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here
No opportunity is required to be given before passing the order tagging the case with other two matters – Arun Kumar Jain, Ex-Director, M/s. P. K. Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Rakesh Bhatia (Liquidator of M/s. P. K. Industries Pvt. Ltd.) – NCLAT New Delhi
It is prerogative of the President of NCLT to assign a matter to a particular Bench or tag with any other matter. The power under Rule 16(d) has been exercised by the President. We do not find any merit in the submissions of the Counsel for the Appellant that the order is passed under Rule 146 and opportunity is required to be given before passing the order tagging the case with other two matters. Present is not a case where power has been exercised under Rule 146. The power has been exercised by the President under Rule 16(d). We, thus, are of the view that the submission of the Appellant that he was entitled for opportunity under Rule 146 before disposal of the Application does not have any merit.