Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. Vs. Sanjeev Maheshwari, Liquidator of U.B. Engineering Ltd. – NCLAT New Delhi
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here […]
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here […]
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here
Arora Traders Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. – Himachal Pradesh High Court Read Post »
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here
R P Chemicals Vs. Greater Arafat Tanners Pvt. Ltd. – NCLT Allahabad Bench Read Post »
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here
Revital Reality Pvt. Ltd. Vs. India Bulls Housing Finance Ltd. – Supreme Court Read Post »
The Adjudicating Authority held that in the case of UCO Bank v. Nicco Corporation Ltd. (2018) ibclaw.in 289 NCLT, Hon’ble NCLT Kolkata Bench vide its order dated 14.02.2018 dealt with a similar situation whereby delay was condoned and the opportunity was granted to the creditor to re-submit the claim. Further, in M/s Globe Express Services v. M/s MM Cargo, the Hon’ble NCLT, New Delhi Bench vide order dated 21.05.2018 has observed that “it is only after distribution of Assets that no further claim can be entertained”. Therefore, it is evident that this Tribunal has the power to condone the delay in submitting the claim to Liquidator before the distribution of Assets.
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here
Satori Global Ltd. Vs. Ms. Shailja Krishna – NCLAT New Delhi Read Post »
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here
Dipak Kumar Shaw Vs. State of West Bengal & Anr. – Calcutta High Court Read Post »
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here
Prayer regarding direction to the resolution Professional to provide the C-Forms for the Invoices, goods related to the year 2016, which is more than 2 years from the date of commencement of CIRP. The Adjudicating Authority held that from the plain reading of the Section 18 of the IBC, it is clear that the resolution professional is only bound to include information for previous two years and not beyond that and as per record, CIRP of Corporate Debtor commenced 09.04.2019, therefore, the resolution professional is duty bound to have financial position of Corporate Debtor for the year F.Y. 2017-18 and 2018-19 and not for the year 2016.
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here
Index Logistics Pvt. Ltd Vs. JMS Logistics and Express Pvt. Ltd. – NCLAT New Delhi Read Post »