Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here […]
Sanjay Bansal and Ors. Vs. Utkal Steel and Power Pvt. Ltd. – NCLAT New Delhi Read Post »
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here
Vaibhav Jain and Anr. Vs. State of Haryana and Ors. – Punjab & Haryana High Court Read Post »
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here
ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs. State Bank of India and Ors. – DRAT Chennai Read Post »
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here
Arun Kumar Singh Vs. U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority – UP REAT Read Post »
Hon’ble NCLT New Delhi Bench refers the judgment of NCLAT in Satori Global Ltd. Vs. Ms. Shailja Krishna (2023) ibclaw.in 360 NCLAT and holds that the judgment passed by Hon’ble NCLAT in M/s. Satori Global Case (supra) will apply to the present case. This Tribunal is not empowered to adjudicate the issues relating to serious allegations of fraud and forgery.
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here
Twenty Five South Realty Ltd. Vs. DLF Ltd. and Ors. – Delhi High Court Read Post »
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here
Mr. Vichitra Narayan Pathak Insolvency Professional – IBBI Disciplinary Committee Read Post »
DRAT held that there is serious doubt as to the bona fides of the tenancy as there is a lack of sufficient evidence to establish the tenancy of the Appellant. The action taken by the C.M.M. to take over the possession of the property cannot be held to be erroneous. What is protected by the SARFAESI Act is a valid and legal tenancy. The Ld. P.O. has discussed the evidence and materials placed on record at great length to conclude that the tenancy is bogus and collusive.
