660

Hon’ble NCLAT in this important judgment, held that:
(i) Limitation for filing of the Appeal does not commence on the date when Appellant became aware of contents but it shall commence when order was pronounced.
(ii) In the present case, orders passed by the Adjudicating Authority were pronounced in the open Court in the presence of the Counsel for the Appellant. In any view of the matter, they cannot contend that they do not have even constructive knowledge of the order on the said date. Knowledge of the order has to be actual or constructive knowledge and when the orders are pronounced, it can very well be said that the constructive knowledge has to be imputed to the contents of the order to an aggrieved party.
(iii) Legislative scheme takes care of all situations where order was pronounced by a Court, it is expected for the parties to diligently apply for certified copy of the order in event there may be any chance to file an appeal.
(iv) Section 12 of the Limitation Act provides for exclusion of the time taken in obtaining certified copy of an order. After an order is pronounced which pronouncement, it was open to apply for the certified copy of order and time taken in preparing the certified copy of the order is required to be excluded.
NCLAT concluded that the limitation for filing an Appeal under Section 61 shall commence from the date when the order is pronounced and not from the date when aggrieved party or Appellant claims to have knowledge of the contents of the order.