Invent Assets Securitization and Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Punjab National Bank and Ors. – Delhi High Court
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here to […]
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here to […]
Under the scheme of Code, when Notice of Dispute has been issued and dispute raised is supported by any evidence and is not a moonshine defence, the Adjudicating Authority is not to entertain Section 9 Application and reject the Section 9 Application. The Notice of Dispute clearly held that no material was sold to M/s. Shapporji and Pallonji & Co. Ltd. The dispute which has been raised is a genuine dispute which required further investigation, cannot be subject to a Section 9 Proceeding. It is always open for the Appellant to seek his remedy in law for recovery of dues, if any, in accordance with law but for such disputed issues, Section 9 Proceeding cannot be invoked at the instance of Operational Creditor. We thus do not find any good ground to entertain this Appeal. The Appeal is dismissed.
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here to
State Bank of India Vs. Arjun Chemicals (P) Ltd. – NCLT Chennai Bench Read Post »
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here to
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here to
Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here to
P.J. Agro Tech Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Water Base Ltd. – Supreme Court Read Post »