Metalyst Forgings Ltd.

Pointing out the ambiguities or lack of specific details or data, post acceptance of the Resolution Plan by the Committee of Creditors(CoC), should be rejected, except in an egregious case were data and facts are fudged or concealed | Not allow or permit the Resolution Applicant to unilaterally amend/modify, or withdraw the Resolution Plan post approval by CoC | Rplan approved by CoC is a creature of the Code and not a pure contract between two consenting parties – Deccan Value Investors L.P. and Anr. Vs. Dinkar Venkatasubramanian and Anr. – Supreme Court

In this important judgment, Hon’ble Supreme Court held that:
(i) Resolution plans are not prepared and submitted by lay persons.
(ii) The assumption is that the resolution applicant would submit the revival/resolution plan specifying the monetary amount and other obligations, after in-depth analysis of the fiscal and commercial viability of the corporate debtor.
(iii) Pointing out the ambiguities or lack of specific details or data, post acceptance of the resolution plan by the Committee of Creditors, should be rejected, except in an egregious case were data and facts are fudged or concealed.
(iv) The resolution applicant cannot withdraw or modify the resolution plan, after the same is approved by the Committee of Creditors.
(v) The resolution plan approved by the Committee of Creditors is a creature of the Code and not a pure contract between two consenting parties.
(vi) It does not allow or permit the resolution applicant to unilaterally amend/modify, or withdraw the resolution plan post approval by the Committee of Creditors.
(vii) Information memorandum is not to be tested applying “the true picture of risk” obligation, albeit as observed by the NCLAT the resolution professional’s obligation to provide information has to be understood on “best effort” basis.

Pointing out the ambiguities or lack of specific details or data, post acceptance of the Resolution Plan by the Committee of Creditors(CoC), should be rejected, except in an egregious case were data and facts are fudged or concealed | Not allow or permit the Resolution Applicant to unilaterally amend/modify, or withdraw the Resolution Plan post approval by CoC | Rplan approved by CoC is a creature of the Code and not a pure contract between two consenting parties – Deccan Value Investors L.P. and Anr. Vs. Dinkar Venkatasubramanian and Anr. – Supreme Court Read Post »

Application u/s 60(5) of the Code can be entertained by the AA both on the question of facts & law or in relation to the insolvency resolution or liquidation proceedings- CoC of Metalyst Forging Ltd. Vs. Deccan Value Investors LP – NCLAT

Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me     Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here to

Application u/s 60(5) of the Code can be entertained by the AA both on the question of facts & law or in relation to the insolvency resolution or liquidation proceedings- CoC of Metalyst Forging Ltd. Vs. Deccan Value Investors LP – NCLAT Read Post »

Due Diligence a key challenge when acquiring an asset under IBC. The issue is that the asset you would not get everything –not all the information, not all the assets, as the Resolution Professional is himself is struggling in managing the business and is not an Industry Person in most of the cases – Deccan Value Investors L.P. and DVI PE (Mauritius) Limited Vs. Deutsche Bank AG,  State Bank of India  Mr. Dinkar Venkatasubramanian – NCLT Mumbai

Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me     Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here to

Due Diligence a key challenge when acquiring an asset under IBC. The issue is that the asset you would not get everything –not all the information, not all the assets, as the Resolution Professional is himself is struggling in managing the business and is not an Industry Person in most of the cases – Deccan Value Investors L.P. and DVI PE (Mauritius) Limited Vs. Deutsche Bank AG,  State Bank of India  Mr. Dinkar Venkatasubramanian – NCLT Mumbai Read Post »

Whether any audit report and other documents was available with the Resolution Professional or Committee of Creditors and whether forensic audit report or any other documents are relevant or not cannot be decided in this appeal – Deccan Value Investors L. P. & Anr. Vs. Dinkar Venkatasubramanian & Anr. – NCLAT New Delhi

Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me     Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here to

Whether any audit report and other documents was available with the Resolution Professional or Committee of Creditors and whether forensic audit report or any other documents are relevant or not cannot be decided in this appeal – Deccan Value Investors L. P. & Anr. Vs. Dinkar Venkatasubramanian & Anr. – NCLAT New Delhi Read Post »

Scroll to Top