The pendency of litigations initiated by any person or stakeholder is not a justifiable ground for non-implementation of Resolution Plan unless stayed by a Court/ Tribunal – Darwin Platform Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. Union Bank of India and Ors. – NCLT Mumbai Bench

In this judgment, Hon’ble NCLT Mumbai Bench clarifies the following issues: A. Can status of the Corporate Debtor reflected as “active, non-compliant” in the records of MCA be a reason of non-implementation of Resolution Plan? B. Is Pendency of litigations initiated by any person or stakeholder a justifiable ground for non-implementation unless the implementation is stayed by a court/tribunal? C. Whether invocation and encashment of PBG furnished for Resolution Plan as per Regulation 36B of CIRP Regulations, is legal and proper? D. Whether an extension of timelines for implementation of approved Resolution Plan should be granted? E. In the event of non-extension of time for implementation of the Resolution Plan, can CIRP be restored?

Scroll to Top