Curative Jurisdiction should not be used to open the floodgates and create a fourth or fifth stage (Review Jurisdiction or Curative Jurisdiction) of Court intervention in an Arbitral Award – Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. Vs. Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. – Supreme Court

K. Rajamouli Vs. A.V.K.N. Swamy – Supreme Court

Arbitration-Supreme Court

An application under section 11 or section 15(2) of the Arbitration Act, for appointment of an arbitrator, will not be barred by pendency of an application under Section 8 of the Act in any suit, nor will the Designate of the Chief Justice be precluded from considering and disposing of an application under Section 11 or 15(2) of the Act – Vijay Kumar Sharma @ Manju Vs. Raghunandan Sharma @ Baburam & Ors. – Supreme Court

Arbitration-Supreme Court

R.L. Kalathia & Co. Vs. State of Gujarat – Supreme Court

Arbitration-Supreme Court

Krishna Electricals Vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd. – Supreme Court

Arbitration-Supreme Court

Anand Brothers P. Ltd. TR. M.D. Vs. Union of India & Ors. – Supreme Court

ACM Pending Cases for other judgment, Arbitration-Supreme Court

Harmony Innovation Shipping Ltd. Vs. Gupta Coal India Ltd. & Anr. – Supreme Court

Arbitration-Supreme Court

M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India & Ors. – Supreme Court

Arbitration-Supreme Court

Northern Railway Vs. M/s. Pioneer Publicity Corp. Pvt. Ltd. – Supreme Court

Arbitration-Supreme Court