18/11/2021

A joint CIRP would be possible only if there is an application for admission of CIRP under the IBC against the landowning entity and there is a strong case for undertaking joint CIRP – Jitender Arora RP M/s. Premia Projects Ltd. Vs. Tek Chand – NCLAT New Delhi

The RP sought the directions from the Adjudicating Authority that either allow RP to take charge of assets of the subsidiary company, or allow RP of the Corporate Debtor to initiate joint CIRP of both the holding company and its subsidiary (i.e. the Corporate Debtor and its subsidiary). The Adjudicating Authority denied for the same.
NCLAT held that if a Corporate Debtor has intricate financial relationship with another company which is controlled in an overwhelming manner by the same set of directors, as the corporate debtor and their businesses are inter-related, intertwined and interwoven, it stands to reason that such companies should be looked at jointly, for matters related to insolvency resolution, as the financial revival of one company will be closely linked to the financial health of the other company. It held that a joint CIRP would be possible only if there is an application for admission of CIRP under the IBC against the landowning entity and there is a strong case for undertaking joint CIRP.

A joint CIRP would be possible only if there is an application for admission of CIRP under the IBC against the landowning entity and there is a strong case for undertaking joint CIRP – Jitender Arora RP M/s. Premia Projects Ltd. Vs. Tek Chand – NCLAT New Delhi Read Post »

Scroll to Top