21/02/2023

Notwithstanding the non obstante clause in Section 142(1) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the power of Supreme Court to transfer criminal cases under Section 406 Cr.P.C. remains intact in relation to offences under Section 138 of the NI Act, 1881 – Yogesh Upadhyay and anr. Vs. Atlanta Ltd. – Supreme Court

Hon’ble Supreme Court held that the contention that the non obstante clause in Section 142(1) of the Act of 1881 would override Section 406 Cr.P.C. and that it would not be permissible for this Court to transfer the said complaint cases, in exercise of power thereunder, cannot be countenanced. It may be noted that the non obstante clause was there in the original Section 142 itself and was not introduced by way of the amendments in the year 2015, along with Section 142(2). The said clause merely has reference to the manner in which cognizance is to be taken in offences under Section 138 of the Act of 1881, as a departure has to be made from the usual procedure inasmuch as prosecution for the said offence stands postponed despite commission of the offence bein complete upon dishonour of the cheque and it must necessarily be in terms of the procedure prescribed. The clause, therefore, has to be read and understood in the context and for the purpose it is used and it does not lend itself to the interpretation that Section 406 Cr.P.C. would stand excluded vis-à-vis offences under Section 138 of the Act of 1881.

Notwithstanding the non obstante clause in Section 142(1) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the power of Supreme Court to transfer criminal cases under Section 406 Cr.P.C. remains intact in relation to offences under Section 138 of the NI Act, 1881 – Yogesh Upadhyay and anr. Vs. Atlanta Ltd. – Supreme Court Read Post »

Scroll to Top