Petitioner cannot approach High Court by seeking to invoke Article 226 of the Constitution of India to indirectly seek the same relief which petitioner has failed to get from DRT and DRAT – M/s Shri Trinkeshwar Developers and Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs. North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors. – Delhi High Court

Hon’ble High Court holds that the remedy of the petitioner to challenge the sale is either before the DRT or DRAT, which remedy petitioner has already initiated and admittedly there is no interim protection granted to the petitioner. Thus, petitioner cannot approach this Court by seeking to invoke Article 226 of the Constitution of India to indirectly seek the same relief which petitioner has failed to get from DRT and DRAT.

Petitioner cannot approach High Court by seeking to invoke Article 226 of the Constitution of India to indirectly seek the same relief which petitioner has failed to get from DRT and DRAT – M/s Shri Trinkeshwar Developers and Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs. North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors. – Delhi High Court Read Post »