Since there is a statutory remedy for the petitioner to file appeal under section 30 of the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 against the impugned order passed by the Recovery Officer, no useful purpose will be served by keeping the writ petition pending – Murtaza Zakiruddin Ahmed @ Zakir Ahmed Vs. Debts Recovery Tribunal and 5 Ors. – Gauhati High Court

Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me     Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here to […]

Since there is a statutory remedy for the petitioner to file appeal under section 30 of the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 against the impugned order passed by the Recovery Officer, no useful purpose will be served by keeping the writ petition pending – Murtaza Zakiruddin Ahmed @ Zakir Ahmed Vs. Debts Recovery Tribunal and 5 Ors. – Gauhati High Court Read Post »