When a specific remedy is available to the aggrieved party, the High Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution is not justified in interfering with the orders of the DRT to examine the correctness of the rejection of the applications – Sh. Vinod Kumar Vs. Himachal Pradesh Financial Corporation – Himachal Pradesh High Court

Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me     Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here to […]

When a specific remedy is available to the aggrieved party, the High Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution is not justified in interfering with the orders of the DRT to examine the correctness of the rejection of the applications – Sh. Vinod Kumar Vs. Himachal Pradesh Financial Corporation – Himachal Pradesh High Court Read Post »