Process of investigation cannot be used by the investigating agency to elicit confession from the accused | No accused can be called upon to make self-incriminating statements or give or furnish self-incriminating evidence – Shashi Prabha Jindal Vs. State – Delhi High Court
Hon’ble High Court granted anticipatory bail to applicant observing that Applicant has joined investigation and there are no allegations that she has misused the liberty granted by the Court and/or tampered with evidence or threatened/intimidated any witness. It is also not the case of the State that custodial interrogation of the applicant is required. Opposition to the present application is primarily on the ground that applicant is denying the allegation of trespassing in the property in question after breaking the lock and the seal put by the Court Receiver pursuant to an order passed by the learned CMM in proceedings under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act.
