Having regard to the provisions contained in U.P. Apartment (Promotion of Construction, Ownership and Maintenance) Act, 2010, read with the explanation of sub-clause (c) of sub-section 2 of Section 3 of Act 2016, the Hon'ble Appellate Tribunal is not persuaded to accept the submissions of the learned counsel for the appellant that the project in respect of Towers/Phase F,G &H, would fall in the definition and ambit/scope of an ongoing project. On a specific query, learned counsel for the appellant could not show any illegality or perversity in the impugned order, passed by the Regulatory Authority.