20/11/2017

No person can take advantage of pendency of a case under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to stall CIRP under Section 9 of the Code – M/s. Ksheeraabd Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/s. Vijay Nirman Company Pvt. Ltd. – NCLAT New Delhi

Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me     Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here

No person can take advantage of pendency of a case under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to stall CIRP under Section 9 of the Code – M/s. Ksheeraabd Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/s. Vijay Nirman Company Pvt. Ltd. – NCLAT New Delhi Read Post »

The interest claimed over the principal is usurious – M/s. Bell Finvest (India) Limited  Vs. Intercon Container Survey & Commodities Pvt. Ltd.  – NCLT Mumbai Bench

Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me     Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here

The interest claimed over the principal is usurious – M/s. Bell Finvest (India) Limited  Vs. Intercon Container Survey & Commodities Pvt. Ltd.  – NCLT Mumbai Bench Read Post »

Once a claim has been dismissed on the ground of limitation or on the ground of delay and laches, such prayer cannot be made thereafter, in absence of fresh cause of action – Mr. Vijay Vasant Dhavle Vs. M/s. Dolce Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. and Others – NCLAT New Delhi

Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me     Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here

Once a claim has been dismissed on the ground of limitation or on the ground of delay and laches, such prayer cannot be made thereafter, in absence of fresh cause of action – Mr. Vijay Vasant Dhavle Vs. M/s. Dolce Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. and Others – NCLAT New Delhi Read Post »

Scroll to Top